Parashat Korach, 5774/2014 edition: Literal overkill, in my opinion
Basics here.
Link to my previous Korach posts here.
One of the best Korach posts ever, by DovBear.
My thoughts for this year regarding this morning's reading: Was all this bloodshed really necessary? Couldn't Korach, Dathan and Aviram and their followers have been punished in a less deadly manner? And why were their families punished? And why the plague against the people for protesting against the bloodshed? Sometimes I think HaShem is pretty bloodthirsty.
My husband's contribution: In 40 years of wandering, these were the only rebellions?! Were there other rebellions of which we have no written record? Why were these rebellions reported in the Torah, whereas others were not?
4 Comments:
Couple of thoughts:
A lot of the commentators think the protestors seem to be continuing the rebellion, rejecting/attempting to undermine Moshe's authority.
Also (this part doesn't have a source) it seems like your question answers your husband's, and maybe vice versa as well: Would you rebel if the last people to try it were punished so harshly?
Although... what's your definition of "rebel"? The previous parsha, Shlach, has two incidents I can think of offhand that I, at least, might consider a rebellion; see 14:4, where they wanted to return to Egypt, and 14:40-45,in which they went into battle against Moshe's explicit command.
(None of this is the standard answer for why the punishment was so harsh, and why it included their families; the usual answer for the latter is a combination of the idea that bad stuff has broad consequences, and the idea that their families encouraged them, quoting a midrash saying that On ben Pelet's wife did the reverse, and with her help he pulled out of Korach's crowd before it was too late, hence our never hearing from him again. The usual answer for the former includes the consequences of attempting to undercut Moshe's and Aharon's legal and moral authority, and the way that Korach and co were rebelling not only against Moshe and Aharon but also God and Torah, and I don't think I can do it justice.)
AnDat, you may have a point about future rebellions having been nipped in the bud due to fear of divine retaliation. Maybe this was the "last straw" for HaShem, as HaShem had already put up with two previous rebellions in the last parasha alone (as you mentioned), not to mention the challenge of Miriam and Aharon.
I'm never happy about families being punished as a unit. I am amused, though, by the midrash that On ben Pelet's wife "rescued" her husband from further participation in the rebellion by literally letting down her hair in public (apparently not a respectable thing for a woman to do at that time) in front of their tent to prevent anyone from approaching.
First rule of middle eastern dictatorships:
Protestors/Rebellions are crushed harshly
Second rule of middle eastern dictatorships:
Collective Punishment of families discourages rebellion
Men will gladly risk their lives for a cause they believe in, they will not risk the lives of their families.
There is a reason that Iraq's funding of PLO terrorism was to support the families of suicide bombers.
Sadly, the middle east has not changed over the millennia.
I think you're probably right on all counts, Miami Al, which, in this case, is unfortunate.
Post a Comment
<< Home